Review of Revit Sand 5 Gloves

In a world of largely online buying, some products seem ideally suited to remote purchase and some less so. Buying anything that needs to fit the body is hazardous, not only because all of our bodies and their many measurements, for example the length of our fingers, are different but because manufacturers’ sizing labels and systems also vary. When buying jeans we might turn up and the Levis store down town and take two sizes into the changing room, try one, then the other, then the first one again before making a decision about what to buy. Buying, say, motorcycling apparel from any of the online suppliers is far more hit and miss. It would be unusual to shell out on two pairs of armoured trousers (maybe costing £500 or £600 each), try them both on at home and return one of them. Most of us look carefully at the sizing advice and opt for the size that seems best – and when the much desired object turns up on the doorstep – perhaps a nice new crash helmet – we are probably hoping that we won’t have to defer our enjoyment and return it – not to mention the hassle of doing so. After buying a helmet that eventually turned out to be painfully too small (which I sold on eBay at a painfully large loss) and heated gloves that were also too tight and burned my knuckles (which I haven’t decided what to do with yet), I have promised myself that I would always buy this type of item in person. I have only partly succeeded.

The success part was my purchase of some hot weather gloves. I think global warming is having a significant effect both on motorcycling and on decisions about travel destinations more generally, though I don’t see the former talked about much. There are always uncomfortably hot days on most tours in Europe but a trip through Spain to Portugal a couple of years back took that discomfort into a potentially hazardous place where even expensive riding gear with all its clever vents could not protect me from the effects of heat exposure. And this must be more so for those riders who chose to travel further south, to Morocco for example. But even our generally miserable weathered UK is now dishing up many days of 30 degrees plus and if you unwittingly ride into one of those days you quickly discover that your normal riding gear is almost completely failing to protect you from the heat and is actually multiplying its ill-effects, apart from those stretches when you can ride at some speed and get some free ventilation. Last week was a day like this for me, innocently going on a couple of hours ride around Cambridge onto the fens. After half an hour or so, I realised that every part of me was too hot, my legs and my leather gloved hands particularly. My bike dash told me it was 31 degrees. As I am often looking for an excuse to search for new gear I decided to combat the personal impact of global warming in three ways: buy some new summer/hot weather gloves, some mesh trousers, and finally to dust off and get better armour for a Revit Air mesh jacket that I bought in 2010 and have barely worn since. Here are a few words about the gloves.

There is a huge choice of mesh, lightweight gloves. Some are very cheap, some expensive, some not intended for road use and some that are. There is rarely a glove that someone, somewhere has not given a bad review for – and when more than one person says, for example, that a particular glove tends to come apart at a particular place, then you have to cross that off the list. The one glove that no one seemed to complain about was the Revit Sand – version 5 glove. I like its looks and a non-black colour seems to make it feel cooler already.

I found a store in London, over in Fulham, that claimed to have all sizes in stock and jumped on the District line, along with a huge crowd of tourists travelling from Victoria to South Kensington, to find it. I had never heard of Urban Rider but the person working there told me they had been there for 18 years and had only recently branched out from catering for city riders into the expanding ‘adventure’ market, under the name, unsurprisingly of Adventure Rider.

The shop had an impressive stock, not just in the amount and choice but also in the brands they have chosen to sell – only, it seemed top quality brands like Klim, Belstaff and Revit. It was so good to confirm that XL really was my size in gloves, though these were designed with someone with slightly longer fingers than me.

So these Revit Sand 5 gloves fit and look good. But it will be a week or so before I get the chance to try them out though who can predict the weather? I’ll write more when I do.

The other bit of hot weather gear I bought is also made by Revit, their Rev’it Airwave 4 Textile Trousers – Anthracite. That’s another story.

Nikon Speedlight SB-24 in first use

One advantage of vintage gear is that everything associated with it is likely to be cheap, often very cheap meaning that you try things out that you wouldn’t normally consider. So, to my purchase of a Nikon F4, I have added a medium quality zoom lens Nikkor 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 AF-D (the review in the link pretty much confirms my own thoughts about the lens and its performance though I feel a little less generous – it only gets acceptably sharp after f5.6 and I would not describe its zooming action as at all smooth, nevertheless its a convenient lens to keep on the camera) – and today, just out of the box with fresh batteries, a Nikon Speedlight SB-24. This was a flash unit that was designed to work extremely closely with, specifically, the Nikon F4. It measures for the correct exposure through the lens during the exposure and as you change settings on the camera such as the aperture or the focal length of the lens the flashgun makes its own internal changes through its clever connections in the hotshoe. (it doesn’t seem to do any of this when fixed to a more modern Nikon like my D810 unfortunately). I’m yet to see the results of a few headshots that I’ve just taken, of course, until I finish the film and get it developed. Youtube offers some useful tutorials on the effect of various directions of pointing the flash head, along with the effect of fixing a white card to the top of the unit – which I have tried as seen in the picture here.

Upto now I have never been interested in using flash and most photographs that I have seen that do use it, even fill-in flash that is supposed to be subtle, have been the exact opposite of the kind of pictures that I am interested in taking. However, I can see that it is possible to use flash carefully and this speedlight/camera combination makes it particularly possible. My first assumption that you point a flash unit directly at (the face of) your subject was clearly (terribly) wrong – that’s why these units can tilt upwards and swivel from side to side of course – so that was my ignorance. I’m going to keep experimenting.

I’m expecting a waist level finder in the next week or so.

Two 1980s film cameras (Nikon-Pentax) compared today

Was it worth it to buy a new film camera when I had a perfectly good one in the drawer, one that I have owned since 1984? It was time for some comparisons. I put a roll of Tri-X through each and developed both films in exactly the same way. I scanned them with exactly the same equipment and settings though I might have made their curves a little different in Lightroom. I took some of the same subjects.

Pappenheim by Pentax

Pappenheim by Pentax ME Super (SMC 50mm f1.4) might have been shot at f2

Nikon F4 | Nikkor 50mm f1.4 AF-D | Tri-X Pan 400 Digitized with Nikon D810 | daylight Home developed in D76 | 6.75 mins | tank

The author photographed by Pentax

Nikon F4 | Nikkor 50mm f1.4 AF-D | Tri-X Pan 400 Digitized with Nikon D810 | daylight Home developed in D76 | 6.75 mins | tank

Bookshelf by Pentax

Nikon F4 | Nikkor 50mm f1.4 AF-D | Tri-X Pan 400 Digitized with Nikon D810 | daylight Home developed in D76 | 6.75 mins | tank

The images are very comparable and it takes a bit of magnification (more than you can do with these images here) to see that the Nikon seems to produce clearer, sharper images, possibly with more contrast though that could be a LR effect. What this comparison of a few images chosen from two rolls of 36 pictures does not show you is the completely out of focus shots that the Pentax produced, probably a good half dozen of those, plus a couple more where the exposure was wrong. The Nikon on the other hand did not drop a single shot. In terms of camera movement, neither of them compare with a modern camera with vibration reduction.

Above the contact from the Pentax

This is the Nikon

A(nother) New Camera: Nikon F4

Having bought Bellamy Hunt’s Film Camera Zen after spending some weeks checking out the old Nikon film cameras from the 1950s to their last F camera, I decided that one of these was for me. I enjoy the lightness and simplicity of my Pentax ME Super that I bought (duty free – supposedly) in 1983 or 4 at Singapore airport, but too often the images are poorly focused (by me) and never exactly sharp. I have hesitated about shelling out for a second film camera. I was interested in the last largely mechanical Nikon F camera, the F3, because of its reputation and nice style. Its currently selling for between £300 and £400 and I couldn’t justify spending that amount. But I noticed, in passing, an F4 at about half this price and have ended up spending around £200 for a beautifully preserved version that arrived this morning from Japan. The F4 was one of three transition professional cameras that Nikon made between mechanical film cameras and their first (professional level) digital SLR, the appropriately named D1. It was manufactured between 1988 and 1996. From the serial on the camera I have bought it looks like it was made in 1992. After the F4 came, predictably, the F5 which is huge and heavy and not just heavy like the F4, and the F6 which is virtually a digital camera that still uses film. Its clever but is on the market for around £1000.

Today, the day after receiving it, I put a roll of Tri-X through it. I wanted to test that basic things like the exposure meter and the focussing worked and also to see whether my more modern lenses would work with this 1980s camera. I shot the whole film in a little over an hour (a record for me – mostly it takes a few months to finish a film) and developed it just now in the kitchen. I was very pleased that my newer G lenses worked very well and focussed more quickly and quietly that the older AF-D lenses. I have quite a collection so its a real attraction for me.

Its old school but I made notes about every exposure so I can check that there are no problems with the camera.

Now that I have developed and scanned the first roll of film, I can say that it performs perfectly. The autofocus works and the exposure meter works very well. The only alert was that this camera predates vibration reduction so there is some obvious camera movement on shutter speeds less than 1/60. I will have to remember that.

Here’s some examples:

Nikon F4 | Nikkor 50mm f1.4 AF-D | Tri-X Pan 400 Digitized with Nikon D810 | daylight Home developed in D76 | 6.75 mins | tank
Nikon F4 | Nikkor 35mm f1.4 G | Tri-X Pan 400

Digitized with Nikon D810 | daylight

Home developed in D76 | 6m 45s | Tank
Nikon F4 | Nikkor 50mm f1.4 AF-D | Tri-X Pan 400 Digitized with Nikon D810 | daylight Home developed in D76 | 6.75 mins | tank

I’m hoping there is some way to bulk edit the camera info in Lightroom etc. In terms of workflow, I have made a preset that makes positive images from the scanned negs, then each image just needs a little tweaking of its curve. This will be fine for B&W but colour negatives are much more tricky and I might resort to Negative Lab Pro, a plugin that costs about £75 at the moment so not cheap. Trying it – the camera and Negative Lab Pro, with some Kodak Gold – about half the price of Portra – is my next plan.

First ride with Keis G601 Heated Touring Gloves

I bought these heated gloves last December on an impulse after reading a positive review in Adventure Bike Rider. I have worn them once for a very short ride after installing the wires through my jacket and today rode from Cambridge out to Eye in Suffolk and back – about 100 miles. The temperature varied between 7 and 9 degrees. It was dry with bright low winter sun and a little wind.

Here they are.

Keis gloves

First, let’s backtrack a little. Buying items like helmets and gloves, or clothing on line, i.e. without trying on different sizes and directly comparing how they feel is hazardous. I have wasted money on a helmet that when I got it could not decide whether it was too small. In the end I decided to keep it and wore it out and about. But an hour’s ride showed me that it was too painful to wear and it had to go – on ebay and at a significant loss because it was too late to return it. Wearing a helmet around the house is just not the same as actually wearing it for a couple of hours in the open air. I also bought these gloves, following the sizing guide on the website, trying them on, thinking yes these are a little tight but will probably stretch, lets keep them. Today I wore them on my first extended ride – 2 and a half hours – and set to their highest heat. The fingers were rather uncomfortable, especially over the knuckles causing me to try to hold on and operate the bike with straight fingers. By the end of the two hours I was feeling that they were rather hot in places and I could not quite manage to turn them down while riding along a motorway, though they are simple to move between the three levels of heat when stationary. But it wasn’t until I got back and took them off that I saw the red marks on my hands where the heating elements run.

An hour later I had this painful blister caused probably by a combination of too much heat i.e. a burn and the pressure.

When I wear them again, if I do, I will try wearing silk liner gloves underneath and keep the heat turned down. I wonder if this is another expensive mistake. In the meantime, I look forward to the Spring and temperatures in double figures.

New Touratech Luggage option for KTM790Adv

Even though the KTM catalogue from 2019 – its the last one that made it into my house – shows their middle-wieght adventure bike, the 790 Adventure, fitted out with black aluminium panniers, most riders seem to put soft, weight-saving luggage on the bike. The brand in vogue seems to have been Mosko Moto. You can fit a surprising amount of travel gear into their Reckless 80 litre bags.

I got drawn into that but always secretly wanted the convenience of some hard luggage, especially when going on a short ride or to do some shopping. And my Touratech aluminium luggage left over from my last BMW was still taking up room in my garage which is also full of a kitchen, old vacuum cleaners and furniture. And a topbox is a handy place to store your helmet while you are in the supermarket. I tried some nice strap-on tail pack from Kreiga, mounted to the Perun rack that I fitted soon after buying the bike a few years back. It was great for carrying some tools on a ride but not much else. Eventually I have caved in and started investigating fitting the mount for my Touratech top box onto my 790. You have to buy the whole set up to get the tubular mount. But Touratech in the UK could not tell me when the black version would come into stock so we agreed to try the kit made for the Husky 701 as they are very similar bikes. The cost was £150.

The kit arrived and on my first attempt to fit it I found that the Husky and the KTM have very slightly differently placed holes for the bolts that fit the rear rack. My second attempt involved fitting the tubular mount onto my Perun rack which was fiddly but possible. And it does not look too bad.

The top box would be much better if black but is fine. I don’t think the taste police will pull me over for it.

tt rack and Zega Pro from the back